Showing posts with label snacks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label snacks. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 3, 2022

Pizzarias: A Forgotten Favorite with Unusual Comeback Potential?

Some snack foods develop very loyal followings. One I learned about today, but I never tasted myself, is Keebler's Pizzarias. They were introduced in 1991 and were supposedly an instant hit:

Pizzarias were made in a novel process from fresh pizza dough and were available in three flavors: Cheese Pizza, Pizza Supreme, and Zesty Pepperoni. Launched in 1991, Pizzarias were reported to be the most successful snack food launch in Keebler's history, earning wholesale revenue of $75 million in their first year. Due to the success of the Pizzarias launch, Keebler was named "New Product Marketer of the Year" in 1992 by the American Marketing Association. Pizzarias also earned a Gold Edison award from the AMA for marketing excellence.


How loyal? Although discontinued in the 1990s (?), the brand has two Facebook groups and its own Wikipedia page. A Reddit posting to r/nostalgia mentioned Pizzarias 4 days ago.

Why would a successful brand be discontinued? Perhaps because management overlooked it. Actually, many managements (plural).

At the time of Pizzarias' introduction, it looks like Keebler was owned by United Biscuits. United Biscuits sold Keebler to Flowers Industries and Artal Luxembourg, a private equity firm in 1997. In 2001 Keebler was bought by Kellogg Company. In 2019 Kellogg sold Keebler to Ferrero SpA. 

At some point, the right to the Pizzarias brand changed hands separately from Keebler. According to this Wikipedia article on Pizzarias, Utz Brands now owns the Pizzarias brand.

Assuming a unit wholesale price of 80 cents, Keebler might have sold 94 million units in 1991. If Utz were to reintroduce the product today, assuming a 50% reduction in unit sales (because of health consciousness) but an increase of, say, 25% due to higher population and faster social contagion, and 50% higher unit price, then a re-introduction could be worth $88 million in revenue in the first year. Or, social media could cause it to go viral, at double the 1991 unit sales, and then the first year would produce $352 million in revenue. Perhaps a vegetable topping-based flavor variant with onion, bell pepper, and celery? Or maybe a healthy homemade dip could go viral for being famous as the perfect complement to pizza flavor (but especially cheese pizza) chips, where the home-made diced vegetable dip is based on the Cajun "holy trinity" vegetables plus tomato?

Tuesday, March 16, 2021

PepsiCo Valuation, Part 3: Investment Thesis

Now that we have indulged our thirst for numbers and quantification of PepsiCo in part 1 and part 2 of this valuation, what are we to make of its value to its customers, suppliers, admirers and detractors? What is the philosophy of this business, and is it stable or fleeting, and how will it evolve in the future?

In the 1990s I once wrote, only half-jokingly, that the four food groups of actual importance were fat, sugar, salt, and chocolate. While anyone with a need for their day's calories can take or leave a bowl of wet barley, they are more likely to look fondly of, and pay more for, food that delivers more potent kicks to their pleasure centers. Of these, PepsiCo delivers only fat, salt, and sugar, with perhaps some traces of chocolate among their Grandma's Cookies, chocolate chip variety.

If you look at each line of business, they do sort out somewhat by this key factor: snack chips made by the superior business Frito-Lay contain both fat and salt (two factors), but Pepsi contains only sugar (one). Of course, Quaker Oaks contains none of the special factors, and since its operating margins are better than those of soda pop, it wrecks my thesis. Worse, we've ignored the fact that among all substances, water is actually more vital than any of fat, sugar, salt or chocolate, and so possibly might command the highest attention. So, while this idea might be at least somewhat clever, it is too simplistic to take seriously. 

Nevertheless, we have a handle on what makes PEP a possibly worthwhile and stable business. Carbohydrates in an appealing form tend to attract notice: pasta, pizza, bread, doughnuts, bagels and so on. If it is flavorful and has an interesting texture, people tend to be attracted to it, and they return for more periodically and with relish. Take corn and mix it with oil, bake it until it is crunchy, salt it, and you have the first word of the Frito-Lay company name.

If you are concerned about health and the quality of food, its vitamin and mineral content, then you are thinking as PepsiCo's recent CEO Indira Nooyi did. To fulfill the need for multi-grains PepsiCo has Sun Chips, for fiber and healthy grains there is Quaker Oats, for low-sugar beverages there is Gatorade, for low-fat foods there are the Baked versions of Frito-Lay's potato chips and corn puffs. While it is still not quite the same as eating raw kale plucked from the ground twelve minutes ago, people are actually willing to eat some of these. After all, you can't digest what you never ate in the first place.

Frito-Lay Investment Thesis

There is little need for me to describe the taste appeal of snack chips here. Potato chips, pretzels, corn chips, tortilla chips, popcorn, and other salty snacks have an enduring appeal. PEP has a leading position in all of these segments and some of the best brand names in the snack business. Though there is plenty of competition, PEP competes quite well on taste, package appeal, breadth of product offering, and quality. This is not a category that needs to be sold to people, they naturally seek it out. 

In some snack categories Frito-Lay dominates, and is unlikely to be displaced by competitors. The original Fritos corn chips have no significant competition. In the tortilla chip segment, Doritos Nacho Cheese is a classic that may never be equaled by any snack chip.

Despite having a commanding lead, at least in the U.S., Frito-Lay experiments with flavors, packaging combinations, and new product categories. Examples include flavored peanuts, Munchies, an annual flavor competition where customers are invited to propose new potato chips flavors, and the hot and spicy flavor mixes (e.g. Flamin' Hot Limon). 

Competitors include Pringles, owned by Kellogg's, Snyder's-Lance, Inc., now a division of Campbell Soup Company, and many, many startups offering products with features aimed to appeal to those seeking healthier or organic foods. Flavored popcorn, alternative root vegetable chips, and vegetable-based snacks are some examples of marketing to segments of the populace seeking to elevate themselves above others through their snack choices. These products are always higher in price, lack distinctive branding, and can often be found at the discount warehouses like Costco.  

Frito-Lay has a number of regional competitors. There has been some consolidation over the last 20 years. Utz (NYSE-UTZ) is probably best known for its potato chips in the Atlantic states area (PA, MD, VA, et al). It makes excellent potato chips equal or superior in quality to Lay's. Warren Buffett is supposedly fond of their potato sticks. It acquired Zapp's (Gramercy, Louisiana) in 2011 and Golden Flake (Birmingham, Alabama) in 2016.

PepsiCo North America Investment Thesis

Over 25 years ago I commented on the appeal of PEP to a friend, who immediately said "but I like the taste of Coca-Cola." It's hard to argue with the idea that Coca-Cola is one of the best known brands in the world. People like Coke, they collect merchandise with the logo, and it is part of America's heritage. Does Pepsi have the same appeal? Hardly.

On the other hand, what of Mountain Dew? Over the years it has continued to grow in strength, shedding competitors of all types, including many that Coca-Cola itself has created to compete with it. Though not quite of the stature of Coca-Cola, Mountain Dew sits in a unique marketing position of name, taste, product color, and sense of serious exuberance unmatched by other soft drinks. Older readers may remember the original marketing, the natural outdoors and sense of a wholeness of the honest person uncontaminated by the excesses of ego. As one might expect, it is difficult to capture in mere words what feelings the brand evokes. Certainly, though, Mello Yello, Sun Drop, Surge, and similar competitors have failed to make much of a dent in Mountain Dew's market segment.

As for the appeal of the product category, that of sugary beverages, it's not a coincidence that the leading soda pop companies were started in Southern states before air conditioning became a widespread convenience. Those who have worked outdoors in high temperatures for an extended period know the appeal of a carbonated beverage. 

Both Coca-Cola and PBNA have had trouble with shrinking sales the past decade. Some chalk this up to people making healthier choices, cutting back on sugary drinks, switching to natural juices, and so on. But I wonder, how much of the trend is due simply to people being less exposed to the outdoors? How many Americans stay inside all summer, in comfortable air conditioning or perhaps jumping between air conditioned spaces? The phrase "quenching a thirst" means less than ever to a growing segment of the population.

PepsiCo and Product Background

I'll close this part of the PepsiCo valuation series with some links to general information about PepsiCo. I'm not saving you much work here, as you can just Google or DuckDuckGo and find this kind of stuff yourself. But there are some shortcuts worth passing along, so here they are.

You may want an overview of what PepsiCo makes. Ironically, perhaps the best way to do this is to find a boycott site, where they try to identify everything that you want to avoid. There's a Foodbeast posting in 2017 that's like this. Doing an image search for "pepsico products list" is also productive. Or you could go to the official source.

Frito-Lay North America Fact Sheet is a two-page flyer with an overview and basic numbers about FLNA.

The FLNA employment site has some videos and provides a good overview of most phases of the business, from manufacturing to in-store merchandising.

The Flamin' Hot product line was introduced to Frito-Lay by Richard MontaƱez. For the fascinating story, look at tanksgoodnews. A movie is supposedly in the works.

More about Flamin' Hot Cheetos on Mashed.com.

Food and Beverage Resources

PotatoPro offers very broad potato industry connections for growers, processors, retailers, restaurants, equipment makers, agricultural supplies and makers of derived products. Frito-Lay is, of course, just one of many companies listed on the web site. I found a deep reservoir of past press releases that are searchable, making it quick to chase down brand names or trace acquisition histories.

Soft drink market share according to Statista.

History of soda pop by Mary Bellis at ThoughtCo.

Mystery Products and Competitors

It was not a Frito-Lay product, but perhaps one of the best Flamin' Hot competitors could be Harvest Hot Crunch. It was sold briefly at Dollar Tree about eight to ten years ago. I sampled these myself, and as I recall they were better than Flamin' Hot Cheetos, and this food reviewer seems to have agreed, giving it a 10/10 score. I have never seen it since, but if it were resurrected it would be significant competition.

Monday, March 15, 2021

PepsiCo Valuation Part 2: Revenues and Operating Margins by Segment

PepsiCo operates seven divisions, divided by product category in North America, and by geographic region outside North America. The company formerly operated six divisions. The table attempts to show the structure both before and after the reorganization in 2019.

Revenue by Division, GAAP
in millions of US$
2014201520162017201820192020
FLNA14,50214,78215,54915,79816,34617,08218,277
QFNA2,5682,5432,5642,5032,4652,4902,739
NAB20,17120,61821,31220,93621,072
PBNA21,70422,572
LatAm9,4258,2286,8207,2087,3547,5756,969
ESSA13,39910,51010,21611,05011,523
Europe12,33012,576
AMENA6,6186,3756,3386,0305,9015,9817,239
AMESA??
APAC??
source'16 AR'16 AR'16 AR'18 AR'18 AR'19 AR'20 10K
total66,68363,05662,79963,52564,66167,16170,372

Revenue Changes
'19 chg'20 chg
FLNA4.5%7%
QFNA1%10%
NAB
PBNA3%4%
LatAm3%-8%
ESSA
Europe7%2%
AMENA
AMESA0%25%
APAC4.5%18%

Frito-Lay is clearly the star division, growing revenues every year and by a significant amount. Over six years FLNA revenue has grown 26%, for a CAGR of 3.93%. Every other division has had challenges at some point, including the namesake soft drink and beverage business in the U.S. Nevertheless, the other divisions are not struggling like some of the other large name brand packaged foods companies.

In years prior to 2019, the Division Review section of the PepsiCo's annual report broke out revenue, GAAP operating profit, and non-GAAP operating profit, along with adjustments and special one-time charges by division. Starting in 4Q19 PepsiCo appears to have ceased reporting revenues by Division, publishing only year-over-year net changes in the revenue. The numbers for 2019 are calculated using the percentage changes shown in the 2019 annual report from the 2018 revenues reported in the 2018 annual report, but these numbers may not match PepsiCo's internal figures. 

The 2020 10K appears to use the same structure used in the 2019 10K, meaning that revenues by Division are not available for 2020 either, and the 10K does not provide more detailed information than the annual report. Therefore 2020 revenues by division are also calculated by extrapolation: the 2019 extrapolated division revenue and the 2020 revenue change figures are used to calculate the 2020 division revenues. Red shaded cells indicate extrapolated figures. Since we don't have base 2018 figures for APAC, and we don't know how AMENA may have contributed to the definition of APAC, we don't have revenue figures for AMESA or APAC in FY19 or FY20. The back-calculated totals are shown in italics on the AMENA line for '19 and '20. These should be correct, but based on what we get from the published reports, we can only be 85% sure.

Operating Profit by Division, GAAP
in millions of US$
2014201520162017201820192020
FLNA4,0544,3044,6594,7935,0085,2585,340
QFNA621560653640637544669
NAB2,4212,7852,9592,7002,276
PBNA2,1791,937
LatAm1,636-206887*9241,0491,1411,033
ESSA1,3891,0811,108a1,199b1,256c
Europe1,3271,353
AMENA9819416191,0731,172
AMESA789661671600
APAC401619477590
source'16 AR'16 AR'16 AR'18 AR'18 AR'19 AR'20 10K
total11,1029,4658,89011,32011,42211,59711,522
* revised to 904 in the FY18 AR
a revised up from 1,061 in FY18 AR to 1,108 in FY19 AR
b revised down from 1,316 in FY18 AR to 1,199 in FY19 AR
c revised down from 1,364 in FY18 AR to 1,256 in FY19 AR
AMESA and APAC op profit figures for FY 17, 18, 19
are from the FY19 AR

Looking at GAAP operating profits, which include special adjustments such as currency exchange, discontinued operations, restructuring, impairment charges, mark-to-market, and merger charges, FLNA is still the clear star of the portfolio. Total operating profit grew 31.7%, for a CAGR of 4.7%. In contrast, PBNA (NAB) is seeing dwindling profits as the U.S. retreats from soda pop. Quaker (QFNA) is only holding its own, but it is dwarfed by Frito-Lay, which is generating profits nearly ten times the size of Quaker's. FLNA generates half of PEP's operating profits.

Computing operating margins by division, it's clear that PEP's prospects are driven by the growth of Frito-Lay and its profitability. QFNA is also reasonably profitable, but even if it were growing rapidly, its contribution would still be small relative to FLNA.

Operating Margin by Division, Calculated
2014201520162017201820192020
FLNA28.0%29.1%30.0%30.3%30.6%30.8%29.2%
QFNA24.2%22.0%25.5%25.6%25.8%21.9%24.4%
NAB12.0%13.5%13.9%12.9%10.8%
PBNA10.0%8.6%
LatAm17.4%-2.5%13.0%12.8%14.3%15.1%14.8%
ESSA10.4%10.3%10.8%10.9%10.9%
Europe10.8%10.8%
AMENA14.8%14.8%9.8%17.8%19.9%
AMESAunk.unk.
APACunk.unk.

FLNA maintains 30% margins consistently, QFNA is less consistent but still manages average margins of 24%. The rest of the divisions manage about 12% operating margins, which is not quite adequate for a world-class food business.

Since we don't have reliable revenue figures for AMESA and APAC, we've skipped computing operating margins for those segments, but they are probably similar to the margins of the other regional segments.

Investment Valuation

Does any of this new information change the valuation we computed in part 1? Probably not. FLNA is stable, and although the other segments are not stellar performers, they have room for improvement. The other regional businesses have the potential to grow their snack businesses into a shape that resembles the success of FLNA, with greatly improved sales growth and operating margins. PEP can even suffer a few more years of sluggish beverage sales in PBNA, and still not see any substantial change to the overall cash generation of the business.

Potential obstacles:

  • Activist investors attempt to break up the company, which then hinders the economy of scale of the regional businesses and makes it more difficult for snacks and beverages to growth in Latin America, Europe, and Asia.
  • Large acquisitions that soak up capital or diminish FLNA by taking management attention away from organic growth of snacks in overseas markets.
  • Excess diversification in food products. Quaker doesn't seem to have injured PEP, but other attempts to gain revenue through expensive acquisitions could be problematic.
  • Excess worldwide diversification. Does PepsiCo focus on doing the right thing in each country market? Does it build product integrity, or does it just fling its products into markets hoping that some will stick?

Reference: Division Alignments

PepsiCo divisions were realigned in 2019. This action appears to have created a new division, APAC, and resulted in the renaming of several others. The company calls these reportable segments and describes them as follows:

  1. FLNA: branded food and snack businesses in the United States and Canada;
  2. QFNA: cereal, rice, pasta and other branded food businesses in the United States and Canada;
  3. PBNA: beverage businesses in the United States and Canada;
  4. LatAm: beverage, food and snack businesses in Latin America;
  5. Europe: beverage, food and snack businesses in Europe;
  6. AMESA: beverage, food and snack businesses in Africa, the Middle East and South Asia; 
  7. APAC: beverage, food and snack businesses in Asia Pacific, Australia and New Zealand and China.

Some of the former division descriptions:

  • Europe Sub-Saharan Africa (ESSA): beverage, food and snack businesses in Europe and Sub-Saharan Africa;
  • Asia, Middle East and North Africa (AMENA): beverage, food and snack businesses in Asia, Middle East and North Africa.